Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Homeaway.com, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 7, 2016No. 3:15-cv-01984-MOPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MOSMAN, Judge.
When new technologies are developed, there is often a tension between those new technologies and efforts to regulate them within a framework built around older technologies. This case is an illustration of that tension. Plaintiff City of Portland sued Defendants HomeAway.com, Inc. and HomeAway, Inc. (collectively “HomeA-way”) for failure to comply with various provisions of the Portland City Code collectively known as the “Transient Lodgings Tax.” HomeAway moves to dismiss the City’s complaint. I GRANT HomeA-wa/s Motion to Dismiss [7] and DENY injunctive relief.
I…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.