Legal Opinion

Eberstein v. Philip Oswalt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1881PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

The plaintiff in error, claiming title in fee to an undivided half of certain lands through a sale made by an executor, brought ejectment to recover possession thereof. The court charged the jury that under the undisputed facts, the deed under which the plaintiff claimed title was void, and that they should render a verdict in favor of the defendants. While a number of questions have been discussed in this court on the argument, yet there seems to be an insurmountable difficulty in the way of the plaintiff’s right to recover, and this will render an examination of the other questions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Toll v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gorham v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  2. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. City National Bank v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Hewitt v. DurantMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Binns v. Isabel, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API