Legal Opinion
Glenn Wooden, Jay Chapman and David McEuen v. The County of Shasta
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 21, 1994No. 92-17049Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
39 F.3d 1190
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Glenn WOODEN, Jay Chapman and David McEuen, et al.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The COUNTY OF SHASTA, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-17049.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 15, 1994.
Decided Oct. 21, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hoptowit v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.