Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Yadher Murillo

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided January 8, 2013No. 14-12-00090-CRPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TRACY CHRISTOPHER, Justice.

Applicant Yadher Murillo appeals the habeas court’s denial of his post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus, arguing that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his plea counsel failed to properly apprise him that he faced presumptively mandatory deportation as a result of his guilty plea, thus rendering his plea involuntary under Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010). We conclude that applicant failed to prove that he was prejudiced by any deficient performance of plea counsel. Finding no abuse…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Jacob Ryan Evans, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  2. Ex Parte Pablo Jose ROLDAN, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  3. Ex Parte Stanley Anozie Obi, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  4. Ex Parte Matthew Leachman, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2018
  5. Ex parte AguileraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API