Legal Opinion

Fallin v. Williamson Cadillac Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1931No. 8619PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobbs, J.

Appellee sued appellants for $588.40, an alleged balance due on the purchase price of a Cadillac automobile purchased by Mrs. R. E. Fallin, the wife of R. E. Fallin. It was alleged that the automobile was purchased by the wife as a necessity and was therefore binding upon her separate estate.

The trial court overruled appellants’ exceptions and rendered judgment against defendants for $555.32 and $122.40 attorney’s fees, interest, and costs.

The contention was that there was no testimony of an agreement to bind the separate estate of appellant Mrs. Fallin, or that the automobile purchased was a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Magee v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co. v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Harris v. FinbergTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Walling v. HannigTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. LutherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re TrammellUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2007
  2. United States v. BeltDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1950
  3. White v. Lubbock Sanitarium Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API