Harris v. Finberg
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. M. D. Ector. A statement of the complicated pleadings and numerous exceptions which marked the progress of this cause in the lower court will subserve no useful purpose. Everything necessary to a proper understanding of the opinion will be found referred to in it.
1Opinion of the Court
Roberts, Chief Justice.
Appellants, who were plaintiffs below, brought suit against appellees on three notes, payable at the office of M. Ash, in Palestine, Texas, amounting to §1,438.20, two of which were clue, and the other, falling clue during the pendency of the suit, was also declared on. They also sought to foreclose a mortgage, executed by defendants 16th of August, 1873, upon a stock of goods that had been given to them by defendants to secure the punctual payment of said notes as they foil due, in which it was stipulated that ' “ said Harris & Fox, or their agent, Michael Ash, are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kirksey v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- Haldeman v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Marshall v. BetnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
- Walcott v. HendrickTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Castro v. John W. Whitlock & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1855
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Rackley v. FowlkesTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- Bear Bros. & Hirsch v. Marx & KempnerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Hamlett v. CoatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Houston v. BlytheTexas Supreme Court · 1883
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.