Legal Opinion

National Machinery Co. v. Towne

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1919PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Lucas county.

1Opinion of the CourtShohl, P. J.

Defendant in error, Charles D. (Towne, was employed by one Arthur^. Souders, ¡who was an independent contractor making some ¡repairs on the factory building of The National Machinery Company of Tiffin, plaintiff in error. OEie was putting flashing in some windows, and was' ¡Standing inside the building on the track of a travel-' ing crane when he was struck by the moving crane and injured.

The petition alleged that the traveling crane was' 30 to 35 feet above the ground, tracks being approximately 35 feet apart and constructed about the room near certain ventilating windows; that the crane…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kline v. Cent. Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Longabaugh v. Virginia City & Truckee RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Fitch v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. Formall v. Standard Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Winona Technical Institute v. StolteIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alabama Ass'n of Insurance Agents v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Hozian v. Crucible Steel Casting Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Cleveland Railway Co. v. RanftOhio Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API