Legal Opinion

Pilliner v. Pilliner

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1943No. 7035PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit and an order requiring plaintiff to pay defendant maintenance. For convenience, we will hereafter refer to the appellant as plaintiff and respondent as defendant.

The action was instituted by plaintiff, praying for a decree of divorce on the grounds of the infliction of grievous mental suffering. Defendant answered, denying the allegations of the complaint and charging plaintiff with wilful desertion and praying for a decree, requiring plaintiff to pay a specified sum for her maintenance while plaintiff lives separate and apart from her.

The evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Simonton v. SimontonIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Sauvageau v. SauvageauIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Spofford v. SpoffordIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Stephens v. StephensIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Merrill v. Fremont Abstract Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Hiltbrand v. HiltbrandIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Holmes v. HolmesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API