Legal Opinion

Hinton v. Teamsters Local Union No. 891

District Court, N.D. Mississippi

Decided April 16, 1993No. EC91-43-S-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SENTER, Chief Judge.

In this case, plaintiff alleges that his former employer, defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS), terminated his employment in violation of the collective bargaining agreement and that the defendant union, Teamsters Local Union No. 891 (Union), violated its duty of fair representation. Plaintiff also charges UPS with racial discrimination under Title VII. Presently before the court are defendants’ motions for summary judgment and the Union’s motion to strike jury demand. 1

FACTS

The plaintiff, William Hinton, a black male, first began working for UPS in 1978. At…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. McMillinDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1996
  2. Tillman v. City of West Point, Miss.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
  3. Young v. RR Morrison and Son, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2000
  4. (PC) Johnson v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  5. Malla L. Pulliam v. DenMar Services, Inc.; et al.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API