Welter v. Highland Realty Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKime, J.
The appellants assign as error: (1) The trial court erred in permitting appellees to file a second amended complaint; (2) the trial court erred in each of its conclusions of law on the finding of facts; (3) the trial court erred in overruling the objections of appellants to the filing of appellees’ second amended complaint; (4) the trial court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial.
As to the first and third specifications, there is no merit, because neither the complaint nor the objections complained of are set out in the brief. Schreiber v. Worm (1904), 164 Ind. 7, 72 N. E.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schreiber v. WormIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Reeves & Co. v. GilletteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- State v. LukinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909
- Ohio Farmers Insurance v. GeddesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Imler v. ImlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
- National Steel Corp. v. ManleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1963
- Moister v. SpickelmierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1939
- Royal Academy of Beauty Culture v. Review Board of Unemployment Compensation Division of Department of TreasuryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942