Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Ritchey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1916No. 22,395PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Rush Circuit Court; Alonzo Blair, Judge. Action by Irving G. Ritchey against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. (Transferred from the Appellate Court under §1405 Burns 1914,. Acts 1901 p. 590.)

1Opinion of the CourtLairy, J.

— -Appellant in its brief makes the statement that it relies for reversal upon four of the errors assigned, namely: “1. Error of the court in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the complaint. 2. Error of the court in its conclusions of law * * *. 3. Error of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a venire de novo. 4. Error of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial.”

Under the rules of this court the brief must contain, under a separate heading of each error relied on, separately numbered propositions and *29points stated concisely and without argument or elaboration,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Standard Live Stock Insurance v. AtkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Baker v. StehleIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Gray v. BlankenbakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Barker, Gdn. v. Central Building & Loan Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Loeser v. GoldbergIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Standard Live Stock Insurance v. AtkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API