Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Dynasty System Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 15, 1984No. 4—84—0337, 4—84—0414 consPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE MILLS

delivered the opinion of the court:

Pyramid sales scheme.

TRO and preliminary injunction issued.

Interlocutory appeal.

We affirm.

The Dynasty System Corporation (TDSC), R. Keith Julian, Pat Julian, and Rachel McClelland — defendants here — bring this interlocutory appeal from denial of their motion to vacate a temporary restraining order and to vacate a preliminary injunction enjoining them from marketing TDSC’s products and services.

We affirm.

I. FACTS

The record discloses that TDSC is a Texas corporation,. R. Keith Julian and Pat Julian are the founders and sole shareholders…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Stein v. HowlettIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Scott v. Association for Childbirth at Home, InternationalIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People Ex Rel. Scott v. BricelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Kugler v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Garcia v. Overload Bond & Investment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Southern College of Naturopathy v. State Ex Rel. BeebeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Motorola Credit Corp. v. UzanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. Mercury Marketing Technologies of Delaware, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. BeebeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API