Legal Opinion
Davis v. Bullington
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided March 26, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chiee Justice ^reen
delivered the opinion of the Court.
The bill in this case was filed by the executors for a declaratory judgment construing the residuary clause of the will of R. Leedy Matthews. From the chancellor’s decree, certain of the parties interested have prosecuted a writ of error.
The clause of the will brought before us is as follows:
“After the bequests I have made are paid I desire the residue of my estate to be invested in a suitable memorial to the memory of my dear mother, Mrs. Virginia Leedy Matthews, and I appoint Emma Leedy Young, Lucy Matthews Jones, my cousins, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- Ewell v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Ensley v. EnsleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- Rhodes v. RhodesTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ratto v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
- Tennessee Division of United Daughters of Confederacy v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- City of Chattanooga, Tenn. v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
- Durell v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
- Lewis v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.