Legal Opinion

Davis v. Bullington

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice ^reen

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The bill in this case was filed by the executors for a declaratory judgment construing the residuary clause of the will of R. Leedy Matthews. From the chancellor’s decree, certain of the parties interested have prosecuted a writ of error.

The clause of the will brought before us is as follows:

“After the bequests I have made are paid I desire the residue of my estate to be invested in a suitable memorial to the memory of my dear mother, Mrs. Virginia Leedy Matthews, and I appoint Emma Leedy Young, Lucy Matthews Jones, my cousins, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Ewell v. SneedTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ensley v. EnsleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Rhodes v. RhodesTennessee Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ratto v. Nashville Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Tennessee Division of United Daughters of Confederacy v. Vanderbilt UniversityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. City of Chattanooga, Tenn. v. Louisville & Nashville R. Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
  4. Durell v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Lewis v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API