Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

(PC) Vargas v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 27, 2024No. 1:20-cv-00083Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOMINIC (AKA DIAMOND) VARGAS, Case No.: 1:20-cv-000083-JLT-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL FILED DECEMBER 5, 2024 13 v. (Doc. 85) 14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND 15 REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Dominic Vargas is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 On December 5, 2024, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Motion to Appointment Counsel 22 Due to Exceptional…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API