Legal Opinion

Celerino v. City of New York Office of the Comptroller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Stallman, J.), entered February 29, 2000, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*230The complaint, seeking monetary damages, punitive damages and injunctive relief for the “negligence and carelessness of the defendant” in enacting changes to the Taxicab Owners and Drivers Rules, which plaintiff claims led to a decrease in the value of his individual taxi medallion, fails to state a cognizable legal claim. We have previously held that the challenged rule…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York City Committee for Taxi Safety v. New York City Taxi & Limousine CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Medical Society v. SobolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API