Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Babcock

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 16, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

O’Brien, S.

The will of the testator clearly indicates that the duties of the executors were intended to be separate from their duties as trustees, and that upon the termination of the executorial duties, namely, the payment of debts and administration expenses and the pecuniary legacies bequeathed in paragraph 1 of the will, the residue of the estate was to be held “ upon trust ” in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2 of the will. (Olcott v. Baldwin, 190 N. Y. 99; Laytin v. Davidson, 95 id. 263; Matter of Vanneck, 175 App. Div. 363; Matter of Keen, 135 Misc. 435.)

The decree made…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olcott v. . BaldwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of VanneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. In re the Estate of ThomasNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
  4. In re the Estate of KeenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Intermediate Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of BelmontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API