Legal Opinion
Cox v. City of Charleston, SC
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided March 4, 2003No. 2:01-3807-18BGPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NORTON, District Judge.
This case is before the court upon the magistrate judge’s recommendation that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. This record includes a report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2003).
I. Time For Filing Objections
A party may object, in writing, to a magistrate judge’s report within ten days after being served with a copy of that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (West 2003). Three days are added to the ten-day period if the recommendation is mailed rather than personally…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Martha Burk v. Augusta-Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Endo International plc and 70 Maple Avenue, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Martha Burk v. Augusta-Richmond CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004