Legal Opinion
Van Gemert v. Boeing Company
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 1, 1980No. 66 Civ. 1820PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RYAN, Chief Judge.
This proceeding initiated by the defendant The Boeing Company (formerly Boeing Airplane Company) seeking the entry of an order determining that this action is to be maintained as a class action under Rule 23(b)(1) and (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, effective July 1, 1966.
The matter comes on for hearing on the return of an order directing “that all present and former holders of The Boeing Company (formerly Boeing Airplane Company) 4%% convertible subordinated debentures, due July 1, 1980 and called for redemption on April 8, 1966, whose debentures were…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Pennsylvania Co. for Insurances on Lives & Granting Annuities v. DeckertCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
3Cited by50 opinions
- 9 Fair empl.prac.cas. 211, 9 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9931 Sandra Wetzel and Mari Ross, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Equal Opportunity Commission as Amicus Curiae v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Holly W. BAUMAN Et Al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Respondent, Union Oil Company, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Plummer v. Chemical BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.