Legal Opinion
DiCello v. United States (In Re the Railway Reorganization Estate, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 28, 1991No. 13-13037PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HELEN S. BALICK, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Trustee of The Railway Reorganization Estate, Inc., f/k/a Delaware and Hudson Railway Company (D & H), has proposed what in essence is a compromise plan of liquidation. That plan represents a series of settlements with numerous types of claimants. The United States has not compromised its claim. It asserts and the Trustee disputes that it has a lien on all of the cash in the estate based upon the terms of its indenture. This issue of the declaratory judgment action before, the court on cross-motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Matter of Cash Currency Exchange, Inc., Debtors. Cash Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Donald C. Shine, ReceiverCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Railway Labor Executives' Assn. v. GibbonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Red Rock v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- McFarland v. Leyh (In re Texas General Petroleum Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Pugh v. BrookCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Texas General Petroleum Corporation. v. LeyhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Western Asbestos Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.