Legal Opinion

Wright-Ahern v. City of Clermont

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided February 25, 2025No. 5:24-cv-00173Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION MARK WRIGHT-AHERN, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 5:24-cv-173-MMH-PRL THE CITY OF CLERMONT, Defendant. ORDER Plaintiff Mark Wright-Ahern appeared for his deposition on December 18, 2024, but refused to proceed because Defendant The City of Clermont’s corporate representative, Nadine Ohlinger, who is also a fact witness, was in attendance. The parties could not reach agreement on the issue, and the deposition was terminated. Defendant then filed a motion to compel Plaintiff’s deposition with its corporate representative in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Wilchombe v. TeeVee Toons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Arthur v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Michael Linet, Inc. v. Village of Wellington, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API