Manhattan Mall Co. v. Shult
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Six, J.:
This is a K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 60-1102 mechanic’s lien case. The controlling issue is whether the lien was timely filed.
Manhattan Mall Company (the Company) sued to remove the cloud of a mechanic’s lien on an abandoned leasehold interest in a shopping mall. The trial court ruled that the lien filed by Alan J. Hastings, an architect contractor and one of the defendants in the lien foreclosure action, was not timely filed. The trial court also ruled that the lien only applied to a leasehold interest. We have jurisdiction under K.S.A. 20-3018(c)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Cott v. Peppermint Twist Management Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Lorbeer v. WeatherbySupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
- Benner-Williams, Inc. v. RomineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Weber v. TillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Fusaro v. First Family Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Security Benefit Life Insurance v. Fleming Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- In the Interest of K.D.O.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Creme De La Creme (Kansas), Inc. v. R&R International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.