Legal Opinion

Dougherty v. Shillingsburg

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 1896No. Appeal, No. 40PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal, No. 40, Jan. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia County, Sept. T., 1898, No. 596, on verdict for defendant. Assumpsit to recover the purchase price of an interest in an oyster boat and oyster beds in Delaware bay. Before Penny-packer, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. The court charged the jury to find for the defendant. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned was above instruction.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Dean,

William Kelly was owner of a half interest in an oyster schooner, also part owner of oyster beds in Delaware bay. He was a single man; having fallen sick in June, 1893, he was taken to St. Agnes Hospital, Philadelphia, where, on the 13th of September following, he died. While in the hospital, about six weeks before his death, he sold, by regularly executed bill of sale, his interest in the schooner and oyster beds to Shillingsburg, the defendant, for $3,000. No part of this money was paid directly to Kelly during his lifetime. After his death, the plaintiff having…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lines v. Lines, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1891
  2. William A. Wagoner's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wallace's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Rocks v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. O'Gorman v. JolleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Popilock v. PiernikoskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Van Sciver v. RothensiesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API