Legal Opinion

Van Sciver v. Rothensies

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1941No. 937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARD, District Judge.

The plaintiff has instituted this action to recover $3,661.15, together with interest thereon from October 15, 1938, which amount was the tax on a profit of $12,-979.07 realized on the sale of certain securities during the year 1935. The defendant included this amount in the plaintiff’s taxable income for that year. It is the plaintiff’s contention that this was unwarranted, that no profit accrued to him, because he held the securities in trust for his son, Earl J. Van Sciver.

The parties _ have agreed that the sole question is whether the defendant wrongfully included the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Estate of SmithPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
  3. Washington's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Rocks v. SheppardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Hollis v. HollisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. I. S. C., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1978
  2. Estate of Bloise v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API