Legal Opinion

Dusel v. Castellani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 1973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly ordered the appellant corporation and its president to make available to petitioner director certain records of the corporation. Matter of Cohen v. Cocoline Prods. (309 N. Y. 119) asserts the reason for this unqualified right (p. 123) in this statement: “Because of these positive duties and potential liabilities, the courts of this State have accorded to corporate directors an absolute, unqualified right, having its roots in the common law, to inspect their corporate books and records [citing cases] ”. (See, also,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. MATTER OF COHEN v. Cocoline Prods.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Davis v. Keilsohn Offset Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brenner v. Hart Systems Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. In Re Leibinger-Roberts, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
  3. Darby Drug Co., Inc. v. ZlotnickDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1983
  4. State ex rel. Oliver v. Society for the Preservation of the Book of Common PrayerTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Baker v. Henry Glass & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API