Legal Opinion
Caminetti v. Guaranty Union Life Ins. Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided September 20, 1943No. L. A. 18666; L. A. 18667; L. A. 18668; L. A. 18669PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
Interveners seek a writ of supersedeas to stay, pending appeal, the force and effect of an order approv*761ing a rehabilitation and reinsurance agreement affecting the twelve mutual life insurance companies involved in these cases. The matter is submitted on the petition and the Insurance Commissioner’s demurrer and answer.
In 1940, commencing in August, the Insurance Commissioner took possession of the assets of the corporations. His action was pursuant to section 1011 of the Insurance Code and was taken on the ground that the companies were in such condition that further transaction of business…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Relfe v. RundleSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Hulbert v. California Etc. Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Luckenbach v. KrempelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Food & Grocery Bureau v. GarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Texas Commerce Bank v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Lobrovich v. GeorgisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- McKee v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Wood v. HersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Morris v. Investment Life Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.