Legal Opinion

Mapes v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 23, 1978No. 403-77PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge

This tax refund suit is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. At issue is the constitutionality of what plaintiffs characterize the federal tax system’s "marriage penalty.” Under existing provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, some married couples incur substantially greater personal income tax liabilities than they would if unmarried and filing as single persons. Plaintiffs cohtend that this discrepancy in tax liabilities constitutes a violation of the due process notions implicit in the fifth amendment and of the equal protection standards incorporated…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Estate of Ralph D. Cowser, Deceased, Patricia Ann Tucker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  2. James O. Druker and Joan S. Druker, Petitioners-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. Peden v. STATE, KANSAS DEPT. OF REVENUESupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. Montgomery v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Druker v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API