Legal Opinion

United States v. Lane

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 16, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, District Judge.

Defendants Lane and Valle move for the suppression and return of three bars of gold seized on May 23, 1962, in the apartment of Lane’s sister at 450 West 24 Street, Manhattan. Defendants were subsequently indicted for unlawfully acquiring and possessing gold bullion and' conspiring to violate provisions of the law regulating the acquisition and holding of gold, in violation of 12 U.S.C. § 95(a) and 18 U.S.C. § 371. The government concedes that the search and seizure took place without either a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

On May 23, 1962, at about 1 P.M.,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. SohnenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1969
  2. United States v. CallyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API