Legal Opinion

Daisy D. Blankenship v. Maxwell Rowntree

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 16, 1955No. 4945_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Maxwell Rowntree instituted this action against Daisy B. Blankenship, individually and as executrix of the estate of G. T. Blankenship, deceased, to recover for business services rendered pursuant to an alleged contract of employment. The action was dismissed as to the defendant in her capacity as executrix. By answer, the defendant in her individual capacity denied the making of the alleged contract. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff; judgment was entered upon the verdict; defendant appealed; and for convenience, continued reference will be made to the parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Laidlaw v. . SageNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Union Electric Light & Power Co. v. Snyder Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  4. McWilliams v. American Fidelity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Schmitt v. EmerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Geddes v. United Financial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Wayne Whiteley, Individually, and Wayne Whiteley, D/B/A Whiteley L.P. Gas v. Okc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. Campen v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. United States v. Irving SternCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Geddes v. United Financial GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API