Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Lanier

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 27, 1998No. Record 971006PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

The primary issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ruling that a plaintiff in a malicious prosecution action failed to prove the element of malice.

We state the evidence in the light most favorable to Frances D. Lanier and Christopher M. Lanier, the prevailing parties in the trial court. Horton v. Horton, 254 Va. 111, 115, 487 S.E.2d 200, 203 (1997); Tuomola v. Regent Univ., 252 Va. 368, 375, 477 S.E.2d 501, 505 (1996). On September 3, 1989, Allyson Hudson, the daughter of David S. Hudson, was severely injured when a tree fell on her while she was playing at the Surry County…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Horton v. HortonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  2. Lee v. Southland Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  3. Tuomala v. Regent UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  4. Freezer v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  5. Bain v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. STATION 2, LLC v. LynchSupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  2. Stanley v. WebberSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. George Wingate v. Scott FulfordCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  4. Daniczek v. SpencerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2016
  5. Ware v. James City County, VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API