Legal Opinion

Central Bank v. Willcox-Pima Overland Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1920No. Civil No. 1771PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the County of Cochise. A. Gr. McAlister, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This action was brought against the 'Willcox-Pima Overland Company, a copartnership composed of H. C. Kimball and S. B. Brown, and H. C. Kimball, to recover upon a promissory note. The summons was served upon H. C. Kimball, who, within the time allowed by the statute, filed a separate “verified” answer. Thereafter the action as to the defendant Kimball was, on motion of the plaintiff, dismissed, but a default judgment was entered against the copartnership, and also against Kimball as a member of the firm. It appears that Kimball had no notice of this action of the court. Subsequently, on his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Douglass v. ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Baxter v. ChuteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Gideon v. DwyerNew York Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Broderick v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Arnold v. Norfolk & New Brunswick Hoslery Co.New York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Badertscher v. BadertscherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. Sprung v. Negwer Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Sprung v. Negwer Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API