Legal Opinion · Dissent

Boutten v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 28, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1DissentMontgomery, J.

Action for damages received on the track of the defendant. Plaintiff testified in his own behalf as follows: "Last year I was at Ahoskie, in the employ of the Norfolk and (338) Carolina Railroad Company. Had started to my work. Work carried me to this side of Stony Creek. I was walking along the Wellington and Powellsville Railroad track. Was getting $15 a month. I was taken sick while walking along, and laid down on the track. The first thing I knew the train was on me. I had been drinking. Drank half pint that day. At this place the Norfolk and Carolina used the Wellington and Powellsville…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spruill v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  2. Dellinger v. . GillespieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Barbee v. . BarbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Wright v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Shaw v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kearney v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Perry v. First Citizens National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. City of Shelby v. LackeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Piedmont Supply Co. v. RozzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Butler v. Armour Fertilizer WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API