Legal Opinion

Marvin Kessna v. Santander Consumer USA Inc., John Doe, and New York Collateral Recovery Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 5, 2026No. 7:26-cv-01411Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARVIN KESSNA, Civil Case Number: 7:26-cv-01411-PMH Plaintiff, _ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO -against- 2 FILE DEFAULT JUDGMENT SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC., JOHN DOE, and NEW YORK ! COLLATERAL RECOVERY CORP., ! Defendants. The Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully moves for an extension of time to file a Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant NEW YORK COLLATERAL RECOVERY CORP. (NYCRR) and, in Application granted. The deadline to move for , >“ |default judgment is adjourned sine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Exquisite Form Indus., Inc. v. Exquisite Fabrics of LondonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  3. Mauro v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1995
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. VucichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API