Legal Opinion

Steward v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 2004No. Civil Action 02-8921PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM

DuBOIS, District Judge.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of April, 2004, upon consideration of the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 12, filed October 24, 2003), Plaintiffs Brief in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 15, filed November 14, 2003), Defendant’s Reply Brief in Support of Summary Judgment (Document No. 16, filed December 1, 2003), Plaintiffs Surreply in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 17, December 10, 2003), IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boandl v. GeithnerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Indiana Dept. of Environmental Mgt. v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Indiana Dept. of Environmental Mgt. v. WestIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API