Legal Opinion

Byerly v. Delk

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

It is established by authoritative decisions of this Court that where the purchaser at a judicial sale fails to comply with his bid, ordinarily the remedy is by motion in the cause, and not by independent action. On such motion the jurisdiction of the court is broad enough to give either the purchaser or any other interested party the relief which the situation as presented requires. The procedure by motion in the cause provides expeditious relief, prevents multiplicity of suits, and saves costs. If an independent action is brought, ordinarily the court ex mero motu will dismiss it. Wilson,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mason and Another v. . MilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  2. Hudson v. . CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Marsh v. . NimocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Pettillo, Ex ParteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Page v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Weaver v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API