Legal Opinion · Dissent

Danner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 22, 1983No. 9031Published

1Dissent

HUTCHINSON,

dissenting.

I would affirm the judgment of disbarment. In my view, Danner’s answer did not properly traverse the “Original Formal Complaint” as required by Section 25, State Bar Rules, and was properly stricken by the trial court.

Section 21 of the State Bar Rules states that the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure shall govern disciplinary proceedings except where in conflict with a specific provision of the bar rules. State Bar of Texas, Rules and Code of Professional Responsibility art. XII, § 21 (Vernon 1973); Greenspan v. State, 618 S.W.2d 939 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth 1981, writ…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stoner v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cox v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. WeinbergTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. O'Quinn v. TateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Sherman v. State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API