Michaels v. Pinten
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Houghton; O’Brien (Patrick H.), J. Assumpsit by John J. Michaels against Philip J. Pinten for a balance due upon a building contract. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The plaintiff is, and has been for about 20 years, a contractor and builder in Houghton county. *457This suit was brought to recover a balance claimed to be due him from the defendant upon a building contract made in June, 1916. Plaintiff’s claim is concisely stated in the declaration to be that on or about June 14, 1916, he made the defendant a bid to excavate for a cellar and basement, and to furnish the labor and material for erecting a dwelling house and painting and decorating the same for $5,360.37, which said bid was made in writing and delivered to defendant; that after the receipt of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Canfield v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Spray v. AyotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- First National Bank v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Edwards v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ToodleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Anderson v. LavelleMichigan Supreme Court · 1938