Kirkpatrick & Co. v. Oldham
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans^. ■.'I/aaarus, J. , .
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Poché, J.
Answeringinterrogatoriespropounded totheui in a garnishment process, the appellants, garnishees, stated that they held a note past due of $2500 the-property of. the defendant Oldham, who had deposited the same with their firm in pledge as a collateral security forsueli balance as he might owe them on account of advances of money which they made to him from time .to tirqe for the purchase of cotton..
They further stated that at the date of the garnishment, he owed them. $42, -which was secured by "pledge on the note, and that they would! *554have a…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Youree v. LimerickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- First Nat. Bank v. LagroneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Burglass v. WrightLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935
- Cusachs v. CusachsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- Cusachs v. CusachsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.