Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Ranier

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1925No. 12,336PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

Complaint by appellee against appellant for personal injuries. From a judgment in favor of appellee, appellant appeals and assigns as error the action of the court in overruling its demurrer to the amended complaint, and in overruling its motion for a new trial.

Appellee, in his amended complaint, among other things, alleged that on July 22,1922, appellant employed in its shops and yards at Garrett, Indiana, a large number of boys from fourteen to eighteen years of age, that it then had in its employ appellee, a boy then sixteen years of age, that said boys, including appellee, were employed…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Binford v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Board of Commissioners v. MutchlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barrett v. StoneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Barrett v. StoneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API