Legal Opinion

Donly v. Metropolitan Realty & Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 24, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; W. S. Bullock, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

It appears that Corsey D. Donly died owning, among other property, a homestead, and leaving a widow, two minor children and an adult son of a former marriage. The widow elected to take a child’s part of the deceased husband’s estate. The appellee corporation acquired the interest of the adult son in the estate, and brought suit for partition. Pleas of the widow and two minor children that the homestead is not subject to partition, were overruled, and the defendants appealed.

Sections 1 and 2 of Article X of the Constitution are as follows:

“Section 1. A homestead to the extent of one hundred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. FineganSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  2. Faircloth v. CarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  3. Godwin v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  4. Hager v. . Nixon and Wife .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. Robinson v. BakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shad v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Spitzer v. Branning, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Moore v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Tullis v. TullisSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  5. Tullis v. TullisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API