Legal Opinion

United States v. Palomo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1996No. 94-20953PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENNIS, Circuit Judge.

This case raises the question whether a criminal defendant has a constitutional right to assistance of counsel in a proceeding for a sentence reduction under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Because we find that the right to counsel does not attach to proceedings initiated by the Government to reduce an otherwise legal sentence, or negotiations concerning the same, we affirm the district court’s denial of Appellant’s motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

On February 10, 1992,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. RouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  3. Blankenship v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Lynell Lynnie Taylor, A/K/A Scoop, A/K/A Lynnie Lynell TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. Michael Joseph Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API