Michael Joseph Scott v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Michael Joseph Scott filed a motion in the district court 1 under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to appeal the district court’s denial of a Rule 35(b) motion. The district court denied Scott relief but granted a certificate of appealability on the ineffective assistance of counsel question. Because there is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel in a Rule 35 appeal, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
In July 1998, the government indicted Scott for federal drug law violations. Scott pleaded guilty to one count and was sentenced to a term of 225…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Steele v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Revels v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Marty Luke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Ronald Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Dir. of the Dep't of Corr. v. KozichSupreme Court of Virginia · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.