Legal Opinion

Michael Joseph Scott v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 19, 2007No. 06-2499PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Michael Joseph Scott filed a motion in the district court 1 under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to appeal the district court’s denial of a Rule 35(b) motion. The district court denied Scott relief but granted a certificate of appealability on the ineffective assistance of counsel question. Because there is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel in a Rule 35 appeal, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

In July 1998, the government indicted Scott for federal drug law violations. Scott pleaded guilty to one count and was sentenced to a term of 225…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Steele v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Revels v. SandersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Marty Luke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Ronald Weaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. Dir. of the Dep't of Corr. v. KozichSupreme Court of Virginia · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API