Welker v. Hazen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 208, Oct. T., 1914, by defendant, from judgment of O. P. Lawrence Co., June T., 1911, No. 8, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of F. E. Welker v. E. E. Hazen. Trespass to recover damages for alienation of affections. Before Porter, P. J. ' The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $5,000. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned are explained in the opinion of the Supreme .Court.
1Opinion of the Court
. Opinion by
Mr. Justice Brown,
Two juries have found that the appellant alienated the affection of appellee’s wife. On his appeal from the judgment entered against him on the first verdict he assigned twenty-six errors. After a careful examination of the matters to which they directed our attention, we were satisfied that the case had been well tried, and, but for an incautious remark of the trial judge in answering points submitted by the defendant, would have affirmed the judgment: Welker v. Hazen, 242 Pa. 603. On this appeal there are but seven assignments. The first and second relate to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sopherstein v. BertelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Welker v. HazenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bonfitto v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Reiner v. Augustinian CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Smith v. PachterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Bonfitto v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Bonfitto v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.