Legal Opinion

State v. McFarland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 2014No. COA13-1234PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

Omar McFarland (“defendant”) appeals from the judgment entered after a Forsyth County jury found him guilty of failing to report a change of address as a sex offender. We find no error at trial, but remand for the trial court to make conclusions of law with regard to defendant’s motion to suppress as required by statute.

• I. Background

Defendant was indicted in Forsyth County for failing to report a change of address as required by the sex offender registration statutes and for having attained habitual felon status. Defendant pled not guilty and proceeded to jury trial on 26 June…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ParisiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  2. State v. FaulkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. State v. BaskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API