State v. Faulk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*625 INMAN, Judge.
*256 When the evidence relevant to a defendant's motion to suppress is undisputed, a trial court denying the motion need not make findings of fact, but it must explain its rationale. Failure to do so precludes meaningful appellate review and requires remand.
Tiffany Faulk ("Defendant") appeals from a judgment following a jury verdict finding her guilty of first degree murder on the basis of malice, premeditation and deliberation. Defendant argues that: (1) the trial court committed plain error by failing to instruct the jury on the defense of duress; (2) the trial court abused its…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BiberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. DixonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
- State v. EscalanteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.