Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Bickerstaff Clay Products, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1996No. 2950175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YATES, Judge.

Lythia Bowen, the wife and dependent of a deceased employee, Verdell Hubert Hunt, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the employer, Bickerstaff Clay Products, Inc. (hereinafter “BCP”), and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company; the trial court ruled that, as a matter of law, Bowen was not entitled to worker’s compensation death benefits.

The facts of this case are undisputed. Hunt, an employee of BCP, suffered a com-pensable injury (silicosis) within the line and scope of his employment on or about July 19, 1989. In September 1990, Hunt entered into a settlement agreement with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wawrinchak v. U. S. Steel Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Kilgore v. Alabama By-Products Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Guy v. SOUTHWEST ALA. COUNCIL ON ALCOHOLISMCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Moss v. StandridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White ex rel. White v. Riley Construction, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Bowen v. Bickerstaff Clay Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API