Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bowen v. Bickerstaff Clay Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 30, 1997No. 1960446Published

1DissentMaddox, Justice

I must respectfully dissent because I do not believe the Court of Civil Appeals adequately distinguished this ease from Kilgore v. Alabama By-Products Corp., 581 So.2d 872 (Ala.Civ.App.1991), or Guy v. Southwest Alabama Council on Alcoholism, 495 So.2d 77 (Ala.Civ.App.1986). The court in Guy concluded that the three-year nonclaim bar found in § 25-5-60, Ala.Code 1975, did not violate the Due Process Clause or the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. In Kilgore the court held:

“Ala.Code 1975, § 25-5-60, reads in pertinent part as follows: ‘In death eases, where the death…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fretwell v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. McDowell v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Nicholson v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Yniestra v. TarletonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Ivory v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API