Legal Opinion

Hansbrough v. State Ex Rel. Pittman Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1942No. 35077PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, P. J.

The cases of Hansbrough and White, appellants, are identical in every respect except as to the bond required, although tried separately. The two cases, although not consolidated, are bound in one volume and briefed together. We will dispose of the Hansbrough appeal first, and in another opinion dispose of the White appeal. 10 So. (2d) 171.

Chapter 349,. Laws of 1938, is in this language:

"Any club, vessel or boat, place or room where liquors are found, kept or possessed or any boat or vessel used in any of the waters of this state in conveying any intoxicating liquors or any person with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McHenry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Redding v. ReddingMississippi Supreme Court · 1933
  3. White v. State Ex Rel. PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stacy v. RossMississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Interest of HolmesMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Keppner v. Gulf Shores, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Brooks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Foreman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API