Legal Opinion
Ross v. City of New London
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 6, 1966No. File No. CV 10-6507-4904PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZarrilli, J.
The plaintiff instituted an action against the city of New London, alleging that she sustained injuries as the result of a fall on March 8, 1965, while walking within the limits of the city on a sidewalk in front of 122 Vauxhall Street and that on March 16,1965, she gave the clerk of the city of New London a written notice of the injury, the pertinent portion of which read as follows: “The claim is that the fall was caused by the neglect of the city in the maintenance and repair of the sidewalk at said site.” To the complaint the defendant filed a demurrer on the specific ground that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morico v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Nicholaus v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Rapid Motor Lines, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Town of Wethersfield v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Flynn v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murray v. City of MilfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Murray v. City Of MilfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- FRANDY v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011