Legal Opinion

Lisoski v. the Embers

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangtry, J.

This is an appeal from the circuit court’s judgment on a de novo review of a workman’s compensation case. The circuit court allowed an increase from 10 per cent to 30 per cent loss of an arm by separation for unscheduled disability to the lower back. The claimant suffered the injury when she lifted a tray of dishes in connection with, her duties as a waitress. The Closing and Evaluation Section of the Workmen’s Compensation Board made the original finding of 10 per cent loss on January 22, 1968, and it was upheld by the Hearing Officer and the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The circuit judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryf v. Hoffman Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Romero v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Moore v. U. S. Plywood Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1969

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  2. Pearson v. SchmittOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Nolan v. State Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Norris v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  5. Hannan v. Good Samaritan HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API