Beaubein v. State

It is alleged that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the conviction. We have examined the record, and find that the evidence on the part of the state, both direct and circumstantial, if believed by the jury, was sufficient to sustain the judgment.

It-is also contended that the court erred in admitting improper and prejudicial evidence, but the record. does not show that counsel for the appellant made any objections or took any exceptions to the admission of the evidence complained of. This assignment of error is not subject to review, under previous decisions of this court, because not…